Staff Editorial: Don’t Let Fear Dictate Refugee Policy
In the shadow of the recent Paris attacks, the debate over the acceptance of Syrian refugees has overtaken media attention. For the past few months, the civil war in Syria has caused many to flee to Europe, and now many are beginning to seek asylum in the United States as well. Due to the terrorist acts of the Islamic State (ISIS) and other similar groups, people around the world are beginning to question whether welcoming Syrians and others fleeing from war in the Middle East is a good idea. Many states in the U.S. have already closed their doors the refugees, and there is a bill currently going through Congress aimed at making it extremely difficult for these people to immigrate to the country. Unfortunately, these acts and measures are simply a reaction of fear, for it would be a mistake to turn away these refugees in their time of need.
Many Americans think that refusing to accept Syrian refugees will make it harder for jihadists and terrorists to make it into the country. This, however, is not entirely true. Whether or not the U.S. decides to accept refugees, the extremists who really do wish to hurt us will find a way in. A majority of these refugees are people fleeing from these militants that the western world so opposes. A popular saying has been going around lately: “If you had a bowl of M&M’s, and you knew ten of them were poisoned, would you eat the M&M’s?” Of course no one would eat the M&M’s, but still millions of people travel by air each day knowing that a terrorist could be on their plane. Others go to movie theaters or museums and knowing there a terrorist could be among them.
Even if the United States closes its door to the Syrians, there is still an equal possibility that terrorists could carry out attacks in the country. What people should be worrying about is not the jihads coming from places in the Middle East, but rather the home-grown extremists who decide to commit acts of terror. Americans should be worrying about people like Adam Lanza, who massacred elementary school students at Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012, or Dylann Roof, who attacked an African church in Charleston, South Carolina, this past summer.
Furthermore, if people really want to stress about ISIS, they should stress about the threat their propaganda poses to young people. It is becoming all too common that college students and other young adults are reading ISIS and extremist propaganda on the internet, traveling to the Middle East to become radicalized, and then returning to their home country with an explosive belt around their waist.
More importantly, though, however humiliating it might be, it is important to recognize that the growing threat of terror is can largely be attributed to the actions of the U.S. and other western nations. Over the past 30 years, the United States has done their fair share of damage in the Middle East. The U.S. military have repeatedly bombed numerous villages and cities in the region, and most of these strikes end up killing more civilians than intended targets. Not only that, but the U.S also has knowingly destroyed these people’s economy and has installed and funded puppet dictators who end up killing even more civilians. It is shocking when Americans claim that these jihads hate the United States solely because of the many “freedoms” its people enjoy, when in reality they hate this country because of the unnecessary pain and suffering we have caused them and their people. In no way whatsoever are these terror attacks committed by ISIS and others justified, but one must wonder why everyone is so hostile to the refugees, when this country’s military bombed their city in the first place.
Concerns about allowing a mass influx of Syrian refugees into the United States are real. It may make it easier possible extremists into the country, and could also give these potential terrorists easier access to groups already within the U.S. Others fear a new wave of immigrants will take jobs or will add to the growing welfare problem already present in America. Another major concern is Syrian refugees’ needs are taking precedence over so many homeless veterans out there. Many of these veterans risked their lives to serve this country, and still they are getting no help once they return from duty. In fact, homeless veterans and national security are among the many internal problems that the government needs to address.
Despite the many outcries against the refugees, one cannot deny that America has always been a beacon of freedom and hope throughout the world. Ever since the early 19th Century, people from all corners of the globe have journeyed to the United States in search for a better life. Almost every single person reading this article probably has ancestors who came to this country for the same reason: opportunity. Without immigrants, America would not be the bustling metropolis it is today. Yet, every time a new wave comes in, people are extremely nasty towards newcomers who just want a safe place to call home. This hypocrisy, which has existed since the first Irish immigrants fled to America from famine in the 1800’s, is the problem that clouds everyone’s judgement, not the Syrian refugees. Immigrants have always been and still are an essential part to the story of this country; why should they be turned away when they are running from the same terrorists that everybody supposedly hates?
Overall, the issue of the Middle East and the Syrian Civil War is a tricky subject, but barring these refugees from entering the country will not the make the United States any safer than it is right now. The truth is that the people who wish to restrict immigration of Syrians are simply reacting in fear much like the American people following the 9/11 attacks. Instead of thinking logically about the situation, they let fear and the media dictate their opinions on matters they will never quite understand. The last time the country responded in fear, the government decided to invade Iraq, a mistake that a majority of the country now regrets. Before the American people decide to react because of the Paris attacks, everyone should start identifying the real issues that are responsible for the worldwide “war on terror.” As for the refugees, they flee from a life that most people here could not even imagine. What right do people have to send them back to a life of persecution and violence?
Harrison Otto is a senior, and is serving as the Cub Editor-in-Chief for the second year in a row. He is the Class of 2017 Treasurer, member of the YMCA...
vienna marinello • Dec 14, 2015 at 2:24 pm
I think this article was great, but I think also that the us should allow reffugees but the screnning should be very very thuro because of the recent isis attackings, especially after paris.
Nate Gangwer • Dec 14, 2015 at 1:40 pm
No. Its quite clear of the intent of Isis and the other terror groups, they sneak as refugees into our country. No matter how many “backround checks” you do, you wont ever know a persons true intent. Letting them in is a mistake in this time, possibly in the future would it be ok.
Darby Bauer • Dec 16, 2015 at 2:04 pm
Th amount of background checks refuges ust go through to be allowed acess into the country is perfectly fine. It takes over two years plus iris scans fingerprints dna, They interview the refugees a dozen times atleast. All the refugees america allows into the country are also registered with the UN which requires een more background checks. We should be letting more into help the crisis not cut people of.
David Groff • Dec 14, 2015 at 12:50 am
I personally feel that we should not welcome refugees til after we deal with Isis
Alex Casper • Dec 2, 2015 at 7:23 pm
Hey guys, great job on this! I am aware this is a very hot topic and can possibly stir some controversy around the school and area due to the political demographics of the community. I am happy to see you have kept a more neutral tone but support positivity towards refugees. This is really great in showing support to any refugee or minority student who attends the school and shows a community acceptance instead of negligently disowning them. I agree with many of the points the article addresses and I jumped for joy when I saw this come from you guys. You guys did a great job at keeping it neutral and stick with reporting instead of flaring political biases. Although many disagree with a school paper getting involved in topics such as this, I strongly encourage you guys to continue. Although most of the staff is under 18, it is important for young minds to be educated on these topics so that they can make decisions for themselves beyond what their parents and neighbors teach them and so when the staff is old enough, they can make these decisions at the polls and even get involved in different rallies for topics that you support. I’m proud of what the cub is accomplishing this year! Can’t wait to read the rest of your articles!